CO129-265 - Public Offices & Others - 1894 — Page 79

75

of Hong Kong

C

the Registrar of the

Supreme Court of that Coloray

unclo

entitled to demand for his

in Cour

benefit payment from the Crown, a

from the suitors

the

CŁ

од

avent of

Aduvally

each fee which under the Vicè

formerly taken by the

Rules were

Judge

Comp

by

the

Registrar of

The Vice

pespect

f the

Admiralty Court in

like business.

of

That in considering the case

the Registrar M. Wingfield

LEFELD

point out that he had taken the fees

the Court

was to ask whether that

under the direction

of

"

and he

direction

कन्है

Coyal justification

Jees.

for his retaining

retaining those

We

We have considered the matter

and in obedience to

Your Lordship's

have the honor

Commands

Report

That

in

ti

opinion neither

the Chief Justice of Hong Kong,

nor the

are

Registrar of the Supreme Court in law entitled to demand for his

dzen

L

benefit payment from the Crown

from the suitors, of the amount of any fee which under the Vice Admiralty formerly taken by The Judge.

rules was

Dy

by the Registrar of the Vice Admiralty, Covert in respect of the like business

Neither of the Officers mentioned

is in our

opinion the same Officer.